May's Master Plan - Tuesday's Update


I write this late afternoon on Tuesday 10 July. Theresa May has held her first Cabinet meeting since Boris Johnson resigned.  The two vice-chairs of the Conservative party have just resigned.  

The Times printed a front page this morning saying “Cabinet in crisis” “… on day of chaos”.

Yet Laura Kuennsberg of BBC reported at lunchtime “PM just arrived – looking remarkably relaxed after yday’s mayhem”.

How? Why?  If I was Theresa May I would be on the crest of a wave.  Everything going to plan.  Let me explain.  


UP UNTIL YESTERDAY LUNCHTIME, MONDAY

Since the Chequers deal was announced on Friday, I’ve been saying that this is just a stepping stone to Article 50 withdrawal.  Why?

Yesterday I wrote about what I believe to be May’s Master Plan.  Her objectives since being appointed leader have been, I believe:
  • Withdraw Article 50 notification so UK remains in EU
  • Consign Brexiters to history, so Europe is no longer the bugbear of the Tory party 
This has been my belief ever since she became leader in 2016, when she:
  • Appointed an arch Remainer as Chancellor, Philip Hammond
  • Appointed Brexiters to all key foreign-focused roles 
My belief was based on:
  •  She’s smart.  Very smart
  • She’s well-advised, not least by husband Philip
  • Her campaigning to Remain in 2016 was not just out of loyalty, but because she believed it to be correct
  • She knew Brexiters had no plan, so would hang themselves from the rope she provided
  • As a former Chairman of the Tory party, she had an almost unrivalled appreciation of party dynamics



YESTERDAY IN PARLIAMENT

Yesterday afternoon, Monday, Theresa May presented the Chequers plan to Parliament and took questions for around 2 hours. She was adamant that the UK will be leaving the EU on 29 March 2019. 

I wondered if my view of her Master Plan is barking up the wrong tree. Maybe it is. But then I took a step back:
  •  She knows full well that the proposal will be unacceptable to the EU, and will be rejected
  • She knows that “no deal” is unaffordable economically, and does not address the UK’s need to collaborate in areas such as aviation, security and health
She's smart.  So let’s make a simple assumption.  She is a fine actor.

Then it all makes sense.


TODAY

Let’s summarise where she is today:
  • She has lost several troublesome Brexiters from her Cabinet including the two most senior in David Davis and Boris Johnson
  • She now has Remainers in key positions of Chancellor, Foreign Secretary and elsewhere
  •  She has appointed a Brexiter to head up Brexit, and also given him a length of rope
  • She has Cabinet agreement for a soft Brexit in the Chequers Proposal, having convinced the cabinet that “no deal” is not an option
  • Key Brexiters, notably Jacob Rees-Mogg, have attacked the Chequers Proposal as worse than “no deal”.  It would leave the UK as a vassal state, or “colony” as Boris has put it in his resignation letter
  • She has avoided a leadership challenge, as the rebels do not have the numbers prepared to risk a general election and the possibility of a Labour government.

The UK goes into the next stage of negotiations with the EU knowing the UK knows:
  • ·         The Chequers proposal will be rejected as cherry-picking
  • ·         “No deal” is not an option.  The UK can’t walk away.  Never could.
  • ·         The EU wants UK to remain


THE ONLY OPTION

The only logical option now is to remain in the EU.

With Brexiters soundly beaten, there will be no more trouble from them for generations.

Both her objectives achieved.


THE FINAL STEP

But there has to be one final step.  Article 50 withdrawal.

The timing is now ideal. The Electoral Commission has investigated the official Leave campaign and found them to have overspent in what is a criminal manner. This is subject to further discussions and potential court cases.  But it is clear that the referendum result must be declared void. 

Oddly, there was no mention of that in yesterday’s Q&A session on the Chequers Proposal.  The vast majority of MPs still regard the result from the 2016 people as trumping all other considerations.

Yet we have a consensus of polls suggesting the 2018 people don’t want Brexit, including those who were 16 and 17 in June 2016.  That was then, this is now. 

Once MPs collectively realise the referendum result cannot stand, it is a simple matter to reverse the legislation based on that result.  Article 50 withdrawal is then virtually automatic, and I would expect the EU to accept it. 

Article 50 withdrawal is not a matter of if, only when.  Now’s the time for Theresa May to show her leadership.  Watch this space.

Comments

  1. UnknownJuly 11, 2018 at 4:21 AM

    What if we have another vote and it still results in a majority for Brexit? It could still happen. Not just because a lot of people still want to Brexit, but because it could be seen as a betrayal of democracy. This would create a crisis even greater than Brexit.

    Like you, I would like to overturn the vote for Brexit as we are heading into the unknown. However, I'm not convinced that adding more uncertainty is the answer.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Charley BravoJuly 12, 2018 at 3:43 AM

    Thanks Jacqui. I envisage the first referendum being declared void as it is against the legal rules governing it. That would make a second vote technically unnecessary. Withdraw article 50 notification and everyone can get on with life. Removes all uncertainty.

    That's unless a second vote was considered necessary politically. There would have to be a very specific question as to what Leave meant. Yes, there could be a majority for that option. But with former 16 and 17 yos able to vote, and a proper referendum campaign, that is frankly unlikely.

    As to democracy, many people think the referendum was a travesty for democracy. Lies and half-lies (on both sides) with no comeback, before considering whether any act was criminal. My son is seething!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

We’re Better Off With Europe

Image
It is easy to be negative about the draft Brexit deal.  So here’s some positive thoughts about the UK remaining in the EU, both financial and social, by being "Better Off With Europe": WE’RE #BetterOffWithEurope Than with the USA Than crashing out of the EU with no collaborations or trade deal defined Than the Brexit ‘deal’ that loses sovereignty and also leaves our future undefined THE ECONOMY We’re #BetterOffWithEurope For a stronger economy For more jobs - there is no ‘Jobs first’ Brexit available For more money for the NHS and public services from employee taxation and VAT FREEDOM FOR BRITS IN EU27 We’re #BetterOffWithEurope For the opportunity to travel, live, work and retire anywhere in EU27. That would be lost, by reciprocation, if UK stops European people from doing that in the UK For some 1.5 million Brits already in EU27 For us still in the UK, plus future generations COLLABORATIONS We’re #BetterOffWithEurope For all the collabora
Read more

What is Theresa May's Plan B?

Image
Theresa May has brought a 'deal' back from Brussels that she says is in the "national interest". Leaders of the 27 EU countries are expected to approve the deal tomorrow, Sunday (indeed now have approved it). But the deal is looking unlikely to get approval from Parliament. Over 80 Tory MPs have indicated they will vote against it, both Leavers and Remainers. Plus all the other parties including the DUP. If the deal is not approved, May has indicated that she will not resign, nor hold a People's Vote. So what is her Plan B? WHAT ABOUT THE DEAL? Firstly, though, why would the deal be rejected? There are objections to specific aspects of the legal Withdrawal Agreement, such as the Irish backstop and having to take EU rules with no say in them. The accompanying non-binding Political Declaration for the Future Relationship is just that. A vague wish-list that amounts to a 'blindfold Brexit'. That is all enough to reject the 'deal'. But in
Read more

What's Next for Brexit?

Image
Theresa May is winning plaudits for her dedication to seeing the Brexit project through. What's next? Brexit is fatally flawed. Firstly Theresa is being driven by an intent to honour the marginal 2016 referendum result, which everyone knows was won by lies, deceit and criminality. Dishonourable. Secondly the ‘deal’ has major flaws which means it satisfies very few.   In particular the Political Declaration (Framework for the Future Relationship) is only 7 pages. Substantially all the negotiation about the future will need to be done AFTER the UK leaves the EU, when it cannot easily go back.  A 'Blind Brexit'.  That is unacceptable to Leavers and Remainers alike. Thirdly the latest polls indicate that support for Remain is clearly over 50%, with her ‘deal’ lagging behind the horror of No Deal. The latest from YouGov about the deal is consistent with polls just before the deal showing Remain support well over 50%.  No majority support for Brexit of any kind. Logi
Read more